As I rethink what comes next for this upcoming school year, I can’t help but revisit challenges I’ve seen year after year. As I learned from Dr. Rick Hanson’s work on the Negativity Bias, our brains are wired to notice the bad and overlook the good. Unfortunately, one thing that stands out are poorly written Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). But I wonder, does well written Special Education documents such as IEPs, Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs) and Progress Monitoring really make a difference for a student’s success?
For the last 15 as a Special Education Teacher, Behavior Analyst, and as a district level coach, I’ve seen both ends of the spectrum:
The difference between the two is staggering. Let’s talk about if these documents do really matter, what the data tells us and what you can do.
When done right, these documents are more than paperwork. They are roadmaps for a student’s learning and behavior support. They:
Despite their importance, creating these documents in compliance and in line with best practices is harder than it sounds. I know there are several barriers and it is easier said than done. The barrier no one escapes: time.
Special Education teachers juggle an impossible list: lesson planning, grading, collaboration with general ed and specialists, IEP writing, data collection, progress monitoring, team meetings—the list goes on.
Even as I became more efficient over time, the legal paperwork demands were a major factor in leaving the classroom. It’s no surprise that teachers struggle to produce high-quality, compliant documents under such pressure.
But here’s the thing—when we cut corners here, students pay the price. And the research confirms it.
In Washington, the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) sets clear requirements: measurable annual goals, well-written Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFPs), and services aligned to student needs—not just compliance checkmarks.
Unfortunately, many new Special Education teachers do not receive formal training in IEP writing. If it doesn’t happen during student teaching, where will teachers learn?
Research from a 2024 mixed-methods study found that students with high-quality, well-implemented IEPs made 20% greater academic gains over one year when compared to their previous performance. Washington’s IEP Quality Review Rubric reinforces that compliance alone is not enough—clarity, alignment, and collaboration are essential to realizing these benefits.
WA Tip: Use OSPI’s IEP Development Modules and Crosswalk Tools to self-check alignment with state standards and best practices. Watch for my upcoming newsletter for a new IEP writing tool.
A BIP must follow a Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) and reflect the function of the behavior. According to OSPI, effective BIPs:
Too often, BIPs are written as a formality—to secure additional support or an alternative placement—rather than as a living guide. Done right, a BIP is one of your most powerful tools:
Research from Vanderbilt’s IRIS Center shows that BIPs only reduce challenging behavior when they are data-driven, collaborative, and implemented with fidelity.
WA Tip: In many districts, behavior support staff and school psychologists co-develop BIPs linked to the FBA. Ask your team: How can we collaborate for correct implementation and what further support you can receive.
More paperwork and a systematic way to communicate with the families and school teams how students are progressing or not progressing. Washington’s Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) and OSPI guidelines highlight Data-Based Individualization (DBI): ongoing, relevant assessments to measure response and adjust support.
Progress monitoring isn’t just extra paperwork—it’s the only way to know if what we’re doing works. When students help set goals and track their own data, studies show increased motivation, ownership, and measurable gains.
WA Tip: Use WA K–12 Learning Standards and Common Core Progress Indicators to create rubrics that track IEP goal mastery. Involve students in the process when appropriate.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s Endrew F. decision raised expectations: IEPs must be “reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” Minimal compliance is no longer enough.
When we ground IEPs and BIPs in data, align them to student needs, and revisit them regularly, we don’t just meet the law—we give students a real shot at progress and teachers get unstuck.
If you work in special education—as a teacher, paraeducator, admin, or specialist—you know the paperwork is intense. I get it, it’s what drove me from the classroom. But when those documents are high-quality, collaborative, and actively guide instruction, they stop being “paperwork” and become what they were meant to be: a roadmap for student success.
Let’s write better, together—for our students, for our schools, and for the future.
What area within special education documentation would you like more support in? What’s the most recent professional development class you attended?